Targeting. It’s quite possibly the most powerful factor in any advertising or marketing campaign, and for good reason: it works. But to reap results, you’ve got to get it right. And that, of course, is easier said than done.
In theory, effective targeting shouldn’t be quite such a challenge. After all, the idea is straightforward: find the right product, find the right user, introduce the two. But as most publishers know, getting those clicks, leads or purchases can be tough. It’s estimated that just a couple of users in every hundred will even think about going near your ads, which means you’re going to have to work extra hard to persuade them.
And that’s where smargeting comes in.
Smargeting is targeting with a twist. It’s smart, savvy targeting, but that doesn’t mean it’s difficult (quite the opposite, in fact, which is another reason why it’s smart).
To make a start with a smargeting approach, we’ll be thinking carefully about our ads from two points of view: the way they look and the way they perform.
There’s plenty that’s already been written about ways to enhance ad performance, and any legitimate methods that optimize revenue clearly have a place in smargeting.
But I’m about to share a smargeting concept that’s not as widely used as it should be.
The received wisdom is that ‘blending’ ads makes them more successful. In other words, if an ad’s colors and looks closely match its environment, users are more likely to click it. The reasoning behind this is so-called ‘ad blindness’, the idea that if ads stand out too much, most users will simply ignore them.
However, as audiences become far more used to advertising tactics, it seems they’re also learning to ignore blended ads, too - despite our attempts to convince them they’re part of the content.
So perhaps another approach is needed. And wha Read the rest of this entry »
